<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=217082&amp;fmt=gif">
4 min read

Do clinical scores tell us all we need to know?

Featured Image

Multiple sclerosis is a disease in which the immune system attacks the myelin sheath that covers nerve fibers. People suffering from this autoimmune disease develop various neurological symptoms that are caused by damage to the nervous system. In the early stages of disease, symptoms vary, making it difficult for doctors to identify them as early stages of MS. Evidence suggests that multiple sclerosis actually starts long before the diagnosis is made.

Patterns show that individuals have significantly higher numbers of doctors visits in the years leading up to diagnosis. Researchers have recently indicated that it is suspected that unrecognized MS relapses cause people to seek medical attention, and even though the disease has not been diagnosed, it is in the fully active phase. As with any disease, early diagnosis leads to better treatment. 

 

Multiple sclerosis starts long before diagnosis. Is it the same in EAE models?

For researchers working on drug development, understanding the disease pathology, progression, and mechanisms underlying disease is equally as important for effective treatments. In development, models that are commonly used for studying MS mechanisms are induced using myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) or myelin proteolipid protein (PLP), which mimic the human MS condition in animals. In the MOG-induced EAE model, disease is induced on day 0 and the first clinical signs begin to present between day 10-12.

 

MOG-EAE clinical score_md biosciences

Figure: Changes in disease severity score in time in MOG-induced EAE 

 

Based on the understanding that human symptoms of disease vary widely, and the realization that disease was present and active long before clinical diagnosis, are we certain that the first signs of clinical symptoms in animals is the start of disease? 

 


New call-to-action


 

Do clinical scores tell us all we need to know?

Our team of scientists set out to answer this using Electrophysiology and measuring the sensory evoked potential (tcSEP) and motor evoked potential (tcMEP) in MOG-induced EAE animals. In looking at the recording of the tcMEP, the amplitude goes up and then down in a naive animal as well as in mild EAE animals, and decreases in animals with severe disease. This is what we would expect to see based on the clinical score.

 

Motor action potential-MOG EAE

Figure: transcranial motor evoked potential in MOG-EAE animals. A) naive B) mild EAE, clinical score 1-2 C) severe EAE, clinical score 3-4

 

When looking at tcSEP however, we see that the P25 signal is much higher in animals with mild disease (clinical score of 1-2 on day 10), when clinical scores are just beginning to appear. The tcSEP goes below the baseline in severe disease (clinical score of 3.5 at day 20) and continues to decrease to the end of the study, whereas the clinical score remains constant from day 20 on.

 

P25 amplitude_MOG-EAE_MD Biosciences

Figure: changes in P25 as disease progresses

 

One of the challenges in the preclinical MOG-EAE model is the fact that disease onset is variable in animals and clinical scores are unable to differentiate disease severity after peak disease on day 20. Electrophysiology provides insight that is otherwise missed when relying on clinical scores alone. From the data, we can see that the P25 is nearly double on day 10 when clinical scores are just appearing and it begins to decrease on day 20 and beyond when clinical scores are maintained.

 


New call-to-action


 

Does P25 in tcSEP really help us understand early symptoms of disease?

In MOG-EAE, 10-12% of the animals never develop clinical signs. We wanted to understand if those animals are truly disease free. In measuring tcSEP in naive animals vs animals that were dosed with MOG but never experienced clinical signs, we can see that the P25 shows an increase over naive, indicating that changes in the sensory system may be an early indicator of what will occur in the motor system. 

Electrophysiology amplitudeFigure: high SEP in MOG-induced EAE animals that did not develop motor dysfunction.

 

In the same way that physicians need to understand symptoms that will lead to earlier diagnosis of disease in the clinic, researchers need to understand the pathology and early disease progression in animals for effective and early treatment. tcMEP is a possible tool for distinguishing between mild and severe disease objectively, allowing the identification of different stages in the progression of disease. Monitoring the P25 wave in tcSEP allows for early identification of disease, which helps in understanding a prophylactic vs therapeutic approach to dosing. It can also be used to monitor disease progression as well as response to treatment. 

EP-in-MOG-EAE

Figure: Illustration depicting sensory monitoring changes occur before motor function alterations. 

 

Monitoring electrophysiology in addition to standard clinical scores provides added insight to preclinical studies that is otherwise missed with clinical scores alone. Talk to our scientists to discuss how you can increase the value in preclinical data using electrophysiology.

 


New call-to-action